![white test eviews white test eviews](http://www.eviews.com/help/content/images/multibreak.044.5.4.jpg)
#White test eviews install#
To do so, you’ll first need to install the sandwich package. Now, let’s compare them with robust standard errors. The standard errors for \(b_1\) (intercept) and \(b_2\) are 43.41 and 2.09, respectively. White test for Heteroskedasticity is general because it does not rely on the normality assumptions and it is also easy to implement. # Multiple R-squared: 0.385, Adjusted R-squared: 0.3688 Actually, after having the results of my estimations using fixed effect model for paned data (for 2 countries period.
![white test eviews white test eviews](http://www.eviews.com/help/content/images/robustreg.043.4.05.jpg)
# Residual standard error: 89.52 on 38 degrees of freedom I would like to ask a question about heteroskedasticity test using Eviews 11. # lm(formula = food_exp ~ income, data = food) One informal way of detecting heteroskedasticity is by creating a residual plot where you plot the least squares residuals against the explanatory variable or \(\hatįirst, let’s check the standard errors of our estimators for our original model. However, one can still use ordinary least squares without correcting for heteroskedasticity because if the sample size is large enough, the variance of the least squares estimator may still be sufficiently small to obtain precise estimates. Most real world data will probably be heteroskedastic. This can affect confidence intervals and hypothesis testing that use those standard errors, which could lead to misleading conclusions. The standard errors computed for the least squares estimators are incorrect.That is, there is another estimator with a smaller variance.
![white test eviews white test eviews](http://www.eviews.com/help/content/images/advtimeser.053.02.014.jpg)